+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 17.4% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning Plus was created as an enhanced reasoning variant, designed to provide even deeper analytical capabilities within the Phi-4 family. Built to maximize reasoning quality while maintaining the efficiency benefits of small models, it represents the most capable reasoning-focused option in the Phi-4 series.
2 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:87.8%(+17.4%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Average Score:70.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:87.8%(+17.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Avg Score:70.3%
Providers:0