+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 49.6% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct offers 3.3K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30($0.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:82.2%(+49.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:32.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:82.2%(+49.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:32.6%
Providers:1