+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 38.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
11 days newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:84.0%(+38.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:46.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:84.0%(+38.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:46.0%
Providers:0