+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 36.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
4 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:84.6%(+36.5%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:48.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:84.6%(+36.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:48.1%
Providers:0