+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 25.7% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
6 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:87.6%(+25.7%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:62.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:87.6%(+25.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:62.0%
Providers:0