+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-3 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 85.7% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (93.3%), AIME 2024 (93.3%), GPQA (84.6%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:26.8%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:46.7%(+19.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:26.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:46.7%(+19.9%)
Providers:0