+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 27.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than Grok-3. Llama 4 Scout is $17.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
1 month newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($17.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:80.7%(+27.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:53.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:80.7%(+27.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:53.1%
Providers:6