+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 59.4% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
16 days newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:84.6%(+59.4%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:25.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:84.6%(+59.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:25.2%
Providers:0