+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 23.2% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
2 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:87.6%(+23.2%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:64.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:87.6%(+23.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:64.5%
Providers:0