+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok 4 Fast vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok 4 Fast leads with 38.3% higher average benchmark score. Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok 4 Fast is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Fast is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.0% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (95.0%), HMMT 2025 (93.3%), AIME 2025 (92.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
5 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Grok 4 Fast
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Average Score:88.9%(+38.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:50.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 90 tok/s
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Avg Score:88.9%(+38.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:50.6%
Providers:0