+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok 4 Fast vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok 4 Fast offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Fast is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.0% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (95.0%), HMMT 2025 (93.3%), AIME 2025 (92.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Grok 4 Fast
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.50
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.40 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 90 tok/s
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2