+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 37.7% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.5% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (100.0%), HMMT25 (96.7%), GPQA (88.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:20.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:58.5%(+37.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:20.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:58.5%(+37.7%)
Providers:9