+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 15.8% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.5% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (100.0%), HMMT25 (96.7%), GPQA (88.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:28.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:43.9%(+15.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:28.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:43.9%(+15.8%)
Providers:0