+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 43.6% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:94.2%(+43.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:50.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:94.2%(+43.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:50.6%
Providers:0