+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 55.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:88.4%(+55.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:88.4%(+55.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:6