+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 17.9% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.5% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (100.0%), HMMT25 (96.7%), GPQA (88.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:23.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:41.7%(+17.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:23.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:41.7%(+17.9%)
Providers:1