+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 37.9% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
7 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:88.4%(+37.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:50.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:88.4%(+37.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:50.5%
Providers:9