+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 42.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:88.4%(+42.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:46.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:88.4%(+42.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:46.0%
Providers:0