+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 Heavy vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 19.6% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
4 months newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:83.9%(+19.6%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:64.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:83.9%(+19.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:64.3%
Providers:0