+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:23.2%
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:36.1%(+12.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:23.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:36.1%(+12.8%)
Providers:0