+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 24.1% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.2% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in C-Eval (92.5%), GSM8k (92.1%), MMLU-redux-2.0 (90.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 days newer
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:23.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:47.3%(+24.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:23.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:47.3%(+24.1%)
Providers:0