+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 45.8% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $17.60 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
11 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($17.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:87.5%(+45.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:41.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:87.5%(+45.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:41.7%
Providers:9