+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 5.3% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:36.8%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:42.1%(+5.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:36.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:42.1%(+5.3%)
Providers:0