Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 21.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Llama 4 Scout is $17.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Grok-4
Llama 4 Scout
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
Grok-4
Llama 4 Scout
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Grok-4
xAI
ZeroEval
Grok-4
Llama 4 Scout
Grok-4
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Together