+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 17.0% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.8%), IFEval (90.3%), AIME 2025 (72.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
2025-08-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:86.1%(+17.0%)
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Average Score:69.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
2024-09
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:86.1%(+17.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Avg Score:69.1%
Providers:0