+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 62.3% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
5 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:87.5%(+62.3%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:25.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:87.5%(+62.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:25.2%
Providers:0