+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 35.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
2 months newer
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:87.5%(+35.5%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:87.5%(+35.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%
Providers:0