+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 25.2% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
2 months newer
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:86.1%(+25.2%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:86.1%(+25.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0