+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 10.1% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 offers 132.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $16.35 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
2 months newer
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($16.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:89.7%(+10.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:79.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:89.7%(+10.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:79.6%
Providers:1