+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-4 vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 19.0% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Grok-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
4 months newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:83.3%(+19.0%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:64.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
2 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:83.3%(+19.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:64.3%
Providers:0