+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 56.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:5.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:62.2%(+56.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 76.41 tok/s
Latency: 1.38ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:5.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:62.2%(+56.3%)
Providers:0