+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 leads with 57.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:10.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:67.9%(+57.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 76.41 tok/s
Latency: 1.38ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:10.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:67.9%(+57.8%)
Providers:0