+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 47.7% higher average benchmark score. Grok Code Fast 1 offers 10.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $1.67 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Input:$0.20
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($1.67 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:4.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:52.1%(+47.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 76.41 tok/s
Latency: 1.38ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:4.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:52.1%(+47.7%)
Providers:1