+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Grok Code Fast 1. Llama 4 Scout is $1.32 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast was developed as a specialized coding model optimized for speed, designed to provide rapid code completion, generation, and assistance. Built to serve developers requiring quick feedback and iterative coding support, it combines programming expertise with low-latency responses.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
4 months newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Input:$0.20
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($1.32 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 76.41 tok/s
Latency: 1.38ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:6