+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok Code Fast 1 vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
MedGemma 4B IT leads with 42.3% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, MedGemma 4B IT is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:8.8%
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:51.2%(+42.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 76.41 tok/s
Latency: 1.38ms
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:8.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:51.2%(+42.3%)
Providers:0