+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Large vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 14.8% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large is a language model developed by AI21 Labs. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.0%), GSM8k (87.0%), MMLU (81.2%). It supports a 512K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents AI21 Labs's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:34.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:49.8%(+14.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:34.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:49.8%(+14.8%)
Providers:0