+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Large vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large leads with 5.0% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Jamba 1.5 Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
1 month newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:79.9%(+5.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:74.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:79.9%(+5.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:74.9%
Providers:0