+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Large vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
6 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:36.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:54.1%(+17.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:36.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:54.1%(+17.2%)
Providers:0