Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 13.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.5M more tokens in context window than Jamba 1.5 Large. Llama 4 Scout is $9.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
7 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22

Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Jamba 1.5 Large

Llama 4 Scout
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
Jamba 1.5 Large

Llama 4 Scout
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Available providers and their performance metrics
Jamba 1.5 Large
Bedrock

Llama 4 Scout
Jamba 1.5 Large

Llama 4 Scout
Jamba 1.5 Large

Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Together