+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Large vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 33.9% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
9 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:36.9%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+33.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:36.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+33.9%)
Providers:0