+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Large vs o4-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o4-mini leads with 44.5% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large offers 212.0K more tokens in context window than o4-mini. o4-mini is $4.50 cheaper per million tokens. o4-mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o4-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o4-mini was created as part of the next generation of OpenAI's reasoning models, designed to continue advancing the balance between analytical capability and operational efficiency. Built to bring cutting-edge reasoning techniques to applications requiring quick turnaround, it represents the evolution of compact reasoning-focused models.
7 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
o4-mini
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40($4.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:36.9%
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Average Score:81.4%(+44.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
o4-mini
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:36.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Avg Score:81.4%(+44.5%)
Providers:1