+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Large vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large leads with 32.0% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Jamba 1.5 Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large is a language model developed by AI21 Labs. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.0%), GSM8k (87.0%), MMLU (81.2%). It supports a 512K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents AI21 Labs's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:52.4%(+32.0%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:20.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:52.4%(+32.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:20.4%
Providers:0