+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Large vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large is a language model developed by AI21 Labs. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.0%), GSM8k (87.0%), MMLU (81.2%). It supports a 512K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents AI21 Labs's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:32.7%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:51.7%(+18.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:32.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:51.7%(+18.9%)
Providers:0