+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 leads with 43.7% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B was developed as NVIDIA's largest Nemotron variant, designed to provide maximum capability through extensive customization of large-scale foundations. Built with 253 billion parameters and NVIDIA's specialized training, it represents the flagship offering in the Nemotron family.
7 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:32.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:76.0%(+43.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:32.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:76.0%(+43.7%)
Providers:0