+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 38.5% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Jamba 1.5 Mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
9 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:32.3%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+38.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:32.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+38.5%)
Providers:0