+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Mistral Large 2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Large 2 leads with 15.8% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Mini offers 256.3K more tokens in context window than Mistral Large 2. Jamba 1.5 Mini is $7.40 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Mistral Large 2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 was introduced as the second generation of Mistral's flagship model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities across diverse language tasks. Built with enhanced reasoning, coding, and multilingual abilities, it represents Mistral's most advanced offering for enterprise and demanding applications.
29 days newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.40($7.40 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:72.8%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:88.5%(+15.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:72.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:88.5%(+15.8%)
Providers:2