+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads with 13.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Jamba 1.5 Mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
10 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:46.6%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:60.4%(+13.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:46.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:60.4%(+13.8%)
Providers:0