+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Lite leads with 11.5% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Mini offers 210.2K more tokens in context window than Nova Lite. Both models have similar pricing. Nova Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nova Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
3 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24($0.30 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:65.9%
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:77.4%(+11.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:65.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:77.4%(+11.5%)
Providers:1