+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Nova Micro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Micro leads with 9.2% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Mini offers 256.3K more tokens in context window than Nova Micro. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Nova Micro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Micro was created as an ultra-compact multimodal model, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Built to bring text and image understanding to edge devices and latency-sensitive applications, it extends Amazon's AI capabilities to minimal footprint scenarios.
3 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Nova Micro
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Input:$0.03
Output:$0.14($0.43 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:65.9%
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Average Score:75.0%(+9.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:65.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Avg Score:75.0%(+9.2%)
Providers:1