+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B leads with 39.2% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Mini offers 256.3K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 30B A3B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Qwen3 30B A3B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B was created with a mixture-of-experts architecture featuring 30 billion total parameters and 3 billion active parameters. Built to provide strong capabilities with efficient inference through sparse activation, it balances performance with practical computational requirements.
8 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:39.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:78.4%(+39.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:39.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:78.4%(+39.2%)
Providers:3