+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Jamba 1.5 Mini vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
QwQ-32B leads with 32.9% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, QwQ-32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
6 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:32.3%
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:65.2%(+32.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:32.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:65.2%(+32.9%)
Providers:0